...or the power to demand the use of premises...Part 2

Let's continue on that trail we started yesterday...

I was able to find the articles referenced in the previous post. They refer to the Population Movement Act (Wvb).

This was also published on April 20, 2022 in the Parliamentary Papers II 2021/22, 36081, no. 4 as the Continuation Act Articles 2c and 4 of the Population Movement Act.

The influx of displaced persons from Ukraine is allegedly so high that the Netherlands is unable to offer them (emergency) shelter within the existing structures. That is why, in these extraordinary circumstances, the government, by Royal Decree of 31 March 2022 (Stb. 2022, 133), has put into force Articles 2c and 4 of the Population Movement Act.

This bill implements the legal obligation in the Population Movement Act to, after a royal decree putting into effect provisions of that act, immediately send a proposal for a law to the House of Representatives on the continuation of the operation of the provisions put into effect.

With this proposal, mayors are given the legal task of taking care of the reception of people from Ukraine. The government sees the reception of displaced persons from Ukraine as a humanitarian obligation. People fleeing the conflict in Ukraine deserve protection in the Netherlands and have on the basis of the EU Temporary Protection Directive (goes right back to 2011) as implemented by bill 29.031 right to decent shelter, livelihood and medical care, among other things.

Background to the legislative proposal

On April 1, 2022, the Dutch government applied emergency law for the reception of people from Ukraine. This was done by taking a royal decree on the basis of the Population Displacement Act with which two articles in that law entered into force. This gives mayors the legal task of taking care of the reception of people from Ukraine. The Population Movement Act includes an obligation to immediately send a bill to the House of Representatives after such a royal decree about the continuation of these two specific articles of law.

In summary it refers to the:

1. Use of state emergency law

2. Suggests that the duration should be limited (2 weeks to flatten the refugees)

3 The legislator has also recognised that sometimes there can be a de facto movement of the people without a burden having preceded it.

I do not understand the context as to whether this (a de facto movement of the people without a burden having preceded it) refers to refugees or the indigenous population.

I am still a couple of articles to try to put everything in context.

Why is this important?

This decree and law is simply a tramp on existing human rights as the rights of the individual matter not when it comes to the rights of a larger group of people.

And after the immigrants of Ukraine we will have the African economic migrants due to starvation because of…you guessed it…climate change. The 2015 Food Chain Reaction—A Global Food Security Game explained this quite well.

Do you remember Star Trek and the famous quote “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few”. This was unpresented propaganda that so many SciFi fanboys can simply not comprehend and regurgitate happily like cows eating grass.

In the coming years where the climate feeding crisis scenario will play out it will become even more evident that the state has no consideration of what was one considered human rights.

When will the people realise that the war with humanity was lost in 1945 with the inauguration of the United Nations and all that has been played since are the pieces of a chess game?

What will the tipping point be? What conditions will today’s 20, 30, 40 and 50 year olds will tolerate compared to their pre-pandemic lifestyle I wonder?

At what stage does human misery become so unbearable that the policeman and the army abandon their masters?

How many loafs of bread weekly will a policeman need to be kept obeying?

Keep reading part 3 of this chain here.