Announcement of a novel coronavirus - no one opposes
Announcement of a lockdown because of a novel coronavirus - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of mask mandates because of a novel coronavirus - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of travel restrictions because of a novel coronavirus - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of efforts into developing a vaccine worldwide - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of approval of a vaccine - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of rollout to over 65 years olds - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of rollout to over 50 years olds - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of rollout to over 18 years olds - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of rollout to over 12 years olds - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of rollout to over 6 years olds - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of vaccine passports/health passes - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
Announcement of booster rollout to over 65 years olds - everyone in opposition but everyone accepts the existence of a novel coronavirus
I am asking. What if there was no novel coronavirus?
Do you understand how you've been played all along?
Many of us opposed numerous steps in this sequence because we were fully aware of where they would lead and the tendency to do sequential progressions like this.